Agonizing_Gas
Shared on Thu, 03/01/2007 - 21:54In a recent story on MSN, a study shows that violent video games can lead to more aggressive preteens and teens. Just the headline of the article indicates that video games are bad, as it includes "Warning:" at the beginning. The article then goes on to discuss both sides of the debate, and states the EU (whoever the hell that is) is pushing to ban violent video games in Europe or at least create uniform laws to prevent the sales of such games to minors. A total ban seems a bit like over kill, but the article is quick to get the correct spin on why it should be okay.
Quote: "Here in the U.S., there are laws that prevent the sale of adult-rated video games to minors. One problem: The Entertainment Software Association reports that more than 80 percent of mature-rated violent video games played by kids are purchased or rented with knowledge or approval from parents."
Um, that's a problem? For who? If the parents understand that the kids are buying violent video games, then the responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of parents. Game makers and the ESRB are doing their part. Game retailers have to do their part. So how is it the gaming industry is to blame?
(Before I continue, I'd like to mention that I discovered who the selling of violent video games to minors is a problem for: Me. When I want to enjoy a good mature title on XBL, it annoys me to no end to have to deal with 10-16 year old, foul-mouthed, racist, neglected miscreants. It's not my job to teach you manners on XBL, and I'll be damned if I'm going to pay to play with the likes of you. If I could, I'd charge a babysitting fee every time I log on)
Back when Clinton was running for office, he talked about family values, and it’s not something I've heard about since the 90's I don't think. I think headlines are misleading, aiming blame at industries that can take the fall, rather than pointing the finger at those directly responsible. Parents. Perhaps the press should take a look at parenting habits in the early 21st century. If they did, I'm sure we would see more accurate and shocking headlines such as:
Family values at an all time low
Parents too self-centered to actually give a damn about their offspring
TV, movies and video games will not raise your children into people that you will actually like
Parenting: It's not for everyone (yes, we're looking at you)
Why you should have had a vasectomy
Now, I could have gotten on board with the "video games are bad" theme if they had been discussing obesity. However, when they talk about the amount of time that kids play or how violent games effect them, I can't do anything but point at the media. It is the misdirection of the media that is contributing to the fall of family values. The placement of blame on anyone but those that are actually responsible is an act that must come to a stop. Only once an issue is brought to light can action be taken and progress be made.
Quote: "Here in the U.S., there are laws that prevent the sale of adult-rated video games to minors. One problem: The Entertainment Software Association reports that more than 80 percent of mature-rated violent video games played by kids are purchased or rented with knowledge or approval from parents."
Um, that's a problem? For who? If the parents understand that the kids are buying violent video games, then the responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of parents. Game makers and the ESRB are doing their part. Game retailers have to do their part. So how is it the gaming industry is to blame?
(Before I continue, I'd like to mention that I discovered who the selling of violent video games to minors is a problem for: Me. When I want to enjoy a good mature title on XBL, it annoys me to no end to have to deal with 10-16 year old, foul-mouthed, racist, neglected miscreants. It's not my job to teach you manners on XBL, and I'll be damned if I'm going to pay to play with the likes of you. If I could, I'd charge a babysitting fee every time I log on)
Back when Clinton was running for office, he talked about family values, and it’s not something I've heard about since the 90's I don't think. I think headlines are misleading, aiming blame at industries that can take the fall, rather than pointing the finger at those directly responsible. Parents. Perhaps the press should take a look at parenting habits in the early 21st century. If they did, I'm sure we would see more accurate and shocking headlines such as:
Family values at an all time low
Parents too self-centered to actually give a damn about their offspring
TV, movies and video games will not raise your children into people that you will actually like
Parenting: It's not for everyone (yes, we're looking at you)
Why you should have had a vasectomy
Now, I could have gotten on board with the "video games are bad" theme if they had been discussing obesity. However, when they talk about the amount of time that kids play or how violent games effect them, I can't do anything but point at the media. It is the misdirection of the media that is contributing to the fall of family values. The placement of blame on anyone but those that are actually responsible is an act that must come to a stop. Only once an issue is brought to light can action be taken and progress be made.
- Agonizing_Gas's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Submitted by Agonizing_Gas on Fri, 03/02/2007 - 10:41
Submitted by SkiddyMcCrash on Fri, 03/02/2007 - 11:28
Submitted by SkiddyMcCrash on Fri, 03/02/2007 - 11:31
Submitted by Falelorn on Thu, 03/01/2007 - 21:59
Submitted by TDrag27 on Wed, 05/02/2007 - 15:01
Submitted by Fetal on Thu, 03/01/2007 - 22:16
Submitted by Devonsangel on Fri, 03/02/2007 - 07:01
Submitted by Castlemonster on Fri, 03/02/2007 - 07:09