Tilting at Windfalls

Big0ne

Shared on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 07:46
Most of you who play online with me know that I'm a Hoosier by both birth and residency.  That's not really all that exciting, but unfortunately it's ruining my cereal every morning.  As most people know there's a primary in my State next week.  Normally I have the luxury of using my DVR to watch my television programming and can skip through the onslaught of political ads that we've been inundated with over the last few weeks.  The problem is, that in the morning, while I'm eating my Honeycombs, I watch the local news in order to get the scoop on the weather that day or any breaking story that might effect me that day.  Regrettably, I don't get the chance to fast forward the commercials, so I'm stuck watching all the political ads during what would ordinarily be a blissful morning meal. 

After 3-4 weeks of this I finally shouted at the TV, "Do you really think we're that stupid!?"  Let me explain.  My favorite time of year is August.  It's hot outside and I'll pick the heat over the cold of January every day of the week.  It's my anniversary in August as well.  We usually get to have a really nice meal and sometimes even take a good vacation in August.  The Chi-town LAN is usually in August and that's always a nice treat.  The other benefit to me in August is that August is our company's end of fiscal year.  We've been fortunate the last few years to earn a profit for all our hard labor and good planning.  I'm not sure if it would be considered a "windfall" profit, but that's more a function of timing and need by a politician then anything else I suppose.  The nice thing though is when our accountant calls and says "Hey fellas, you've got too much money in the bank, either spend it or give it to Uncle Sam in the form of taxes."  That's the call we like to hear.  We get to update any office equipment, buy any new tools we might need, invest in some building upgrades or repairs, and all most always, I get to pad my bonus check with a few extra greenbacks. 

So, when in the morning I see ads from both Clinton and Obama talking about how they want to pay for whatever pandering problem they've identified by "taxing the windfall profits of the oil companies", I don't know whether to laugh at the lunacy of such a statement, or be sad for the millions of Americans who'll fall for it.  Do you really think that Exxon and Shell and the various other companies will just hand over all that "landfall" profit?  The correct answer is Hell No!  They will simply spend what they can on themselves in order to keep the government's greedy hands off of their money.  That's right, let's not forget that while politicians like to paint big companies as greedy corporations, there's never been a more greedy organization then the government itself, but I digress.  There's no way that the oil companies accountants will show a profit large enough to be overly taxed in order to pay for whatever program Clinton or Obama have cooked up.  Even if they couldn't spend it/hide it all, and I have no doubt that they can, they won't just eat that loss.  The money you would've saved by the reduction in federal gas tax at the pump will be lost to the oil companies price raise in order to cover their own losses.  How do these guys even get away with these proposals without people laughing to their faces?

Here's the other laughable part of the equation.  These same anti-business, pro-government folks keep calling on these energy companies to develop more alternative energy solutions and spend more money cleaning up some of the processes that they currently use.  Now, I wonder what it would take for a company to be able to do those kinds of things?  I guess it might take the company to earn enough money to be able to invest in such projects.  That's right, it's going to require that the energy company....wait for it.......wait for it.....EARN A PROFIT!  But wait!  Hillary thinks a big company earning a profit is a bad thing.  If not a bad thing then at the very least something that should be penalized and/or have more government regulation of.  If there is any doubt that these to Democratic candidates are socialists at this point, the recent media blitz surrounding their campaigns in my state has dispelled such doubts.  I didn't even get into the follow up interview I saw regarding health care.

I would say that I'm looking forward to November when this campaign is over, unfortunately some of these folks might win and then the real problems start.

Comments

Zikan's picture
Submitted by Zikan on Mon, 05/19/2008 - 11:34
It's nice to see my friends to the west getting the full onslaught of the primary ads that the rest of us had to endure. Usually by this time in the race it's all over but the singing and you poor Hoosiers don't get the attention you so richly deserve ;)
MikeJames's picture
Submitted by MikeJames on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 08:16
MJ in 2012! :D
Stryker927's picture
Submitted by Stryker927 on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 08:20
MJ FTW! :) Nice blog Big. Enjoyed it. Thanks!
MTK005's picture
Submitted by MTK005 on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 09:44
Big - I'll only say that the issue for many of the politicians (on both sides of the aisle) is not the profits, but Big Oil companies making RECORD profits and BILLIONS of dollars last year, while gas prices continue to rise and those companies DON'T invest most of their profits into alternative energy. In an ideal world, yes, we'd let them keep their full profits. However, with gas prices, airline costs, and most significant of all food prices all rising drastically, this is one possible solution. To put it in terms you best understand - would you rather that the Fed raise taxes on you to cover help for people who cannot afford food, or see the Fed raise taxes on Big Oil Companies? I am sure I know your answer to that one. ;-)
Big0ne's picture
Submitted by Big0ne on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 10:00
MTK - Setting aside the fact that raising taxes, regardless to whom you raise them upon, never helps stimulate the economy or produce growth, my point was that the Govt. will not get any money out of the deal. If they raise the taxes on the Oil Co. profits, the Oil Co. will just show no profit. So the promises of less burden on the average American by penalizing the "wealthy" Oil Co. can't be funded. It's smoke and mirrors man, smoke and mirrors.
ZeroCool's picture
Submitted by ZeroCool on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 21:11
MTK, the problem with the "record profits" of oil companies is that as a percentage of their revenue, they're not making all that much. Companies like Coke, McDonalds, etc. have substantially higher profit margins than oil companies. For every dollar the oil companies make, only about 7 cents is profit. For most companies, that number is closer to 20 cents on the dollar profit. You're giving more of your money to that horrible, evil corporate profit when you buy a McMeal than when you fill the tank in your car. Just something to think about...
ZeroCool's picture
Submitted by ZeroCool on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 21:16
Oh, and for the record, I'd rather have the government raise taxes on businesses that do not supply a necessity over companies that do. Because the money for those taxes come out of my pocket when I buy whatever product or service. Is it better to tax the gas that the struggling landscaping crew needs to fuel their mowers just to scrape together a living or should we tax the luxury yachts that the overprivileged waste their money on?

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p