Frankenstein’s monster and Jack Thompson

Dybbuk

Shared on Sat, 03/24/2007 - 13:37

Like the internet, video games, and recorded music, as film became a more popular and common form of entertainment so did the attention it received from the "moral crusaders". The voices of these early crusaders with their cult of traditional family values is being regurgitated today by the likes of Hillary Clinton, Alberto Gonzales and Jack Thompson. They evangelized that this new medium is dangerous because they believed it would transform their children into violent root-sucking sodomites. They called for strict laws governing film content and communities began to ban theaters all together. In response to this pressure Edison like the creature in Mary Shelly's story feared this mob of miscreants. Edison capitulated setting up the first Board of Censors, seething with "religious and education leaders". Frankenstein, the first horror film, ironically became the first victim of this mob. Edison stressed that the more sensational elements of the Mary Shelly’s story were sanitized .

The March 15, 1910 edition of The Edison Kinetogram, the catalog that the Edison Company would send to distributors to hype their new films, described the film as such-

“To those familiar with Mrs. Shelly’s story it will be evident that we have carefully omitted anything which might be any possibility shock any portion of the audience. In making the film the Edison Co. has carefully tried to eliminate all actual repulsive situations and to concentrate its endeavors upon the mystic and psychological problems that are to be found in this weird tale. Wherever, therefore, the film differs from the original story it is purely with the idea of eliminating what would be repulsive to a moving picture audience.”


One of the major changes made to the story concerns the creation of Frankenstein’s monster. While in Shelly’s novel she did not go into specifics about the monster’s creation, the creation scene in the film certainly owes more to alchemy than science. Instead, the monster is reviled as a reflection of Frankenstein’s predisposition to depravity that leads him to molest divinity's domain.


Comments

UnwashedMass's picture
Submitted by UnwashedMass on Sat, 03/24/2007 - 14:22
"...that leads him to molest divinity's domain." Dude, too much for a Saturday! Making me think is not fair- it's the weekend! :) Very cool...
J-Cat's picture
Submitted by J-Cat on Sat, 03/24/2007 - 14:48
Crazy coincidence: I am reading Frankenstein as part of my 50 book challenge (50 books, 1 year). I am loving it. I'm looking forward to seeing more. I also got Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde. Was it ever a movie as well? Of so are you going to review it?
Dybbuk's picture
Submitted by Dybbuk on Sat, 03/24/2007 - 15:10
yes i am looking for a good public domain copy of the 1908 version of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. I will review it in the coming weeks. i have a few others that will come first.
hilskie's picture
Submitted by hilskie on Sat, 03/24/2007 - 16:17
I had the opportunity to read the book when I was in HS College Prep English...I loved the book...the creation of His monster was a bi-product of the theme of the book...there's so much more to it than that... I believe in our society today, we have as bad..probably worse things in the public...bombarding us on a minute to minute basis. You gotta love that old time movie stuff tho'...super innovative for their time. :)

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p