360 really comes out as the clear winner in this video, less fogging, better lighting, better particles..but the game still does not scream NEXT GEN to me
Submitted by Nochnoi-Dozor on Sat, 03/17/2007 - 14:15
My question is, what defines NEXT GENERATION? Is it sharp crystal clear graphics? Or is it a new inovative control system like the Wii? I'm a proud owner of a 360 (I bought it at launch and still ticking...knock on wood), I am considering the purchase of a Wii, but for some reason right now (IMO) I find the Wii control system and the Sixaxis a gimmick. I do think that Sony's Home, is somewhat of a next gen proposal, I've always like the idea of surfing the web in a realtime 3D environment, like you see in the cheesey B rate sci-fi movies.
to me Next Gen is taking games to the next level..
Graphically can sometime do this, but game play mostly for me..
PS Home I think will be great.. hope it takes off..
Luckily SIXAXIS controls have been dropped from many games, and you can turn them off in the other ones (except for fl0w but it works there).. and honestly the Wii controls are far superior to the PS3 ones
Why does the Color look like shit on every PS3 game? People say its the TV's fault. Every game comparison I've seen looked like it was displaying half the colors.
its not the TV, what it is, is simple.. the PS3 can not handle large amount of textures. This is a memory, speed and hardware issue.
Some games they can get away with it, like Motorstorm where you have a TON of very similar colors, so doing hue changes on the textures work, same with Resistance.. But when you get into games where the amount of textures needs to be more then simple hue changing, like Ridge Racer they suck.
In the case of AC4 its really down to lazy developers.. there are not really a large number of textures from what I can see in the videos, they just must not have the hardware handling of the textures down.
360 has a great texture pipeline, tons of memory, super fast drive and better harddrive cache when needed. They can pull the textures faster and display them faster.. with a dead slow bluray they are screwed
Submitted by fecknmental on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 16:34
Hmmi am not too convinced by this if you actually look at the video you can see the quality of the PS3 is bluerier and blockier than the 360 version.
Its still early days and from what i have seen on other web site (non biased) the PS3 will wipe the floor with the 360 in a year or so thats why i am waiting.
The games on the 360 are shocking in quality as well christ look at Superman returns (quite recent) so it seems to be just a case that the developers and thats till havent got to grips with the PS3 yet.
Not wanting to sound argumentative or anything but this has to be one of the biggest MS fanboy forums i have come across if you check the real non biased forums and websites were people are being honest the PS3 offers much more value for money and even quality of games as to what to expect in the future. This is coming from game developers and game testers who have all chosen the PS3 over the 360.
Comments
Submitted by Nochnoi-Dozor on Sat, 03/17/2007 - 14:15
Submitted by Falelorn on Sat, 03/17/2007 - 14:21
Submitted by Rhysode on Sat, 03/17/2007 - 14:43
Submitted by Falelorn on Sat, 03/17/2007 - 15:12
Submitted by Baine on Sat, 03/17/2007 - 16:28
Submitted by fecknmental on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 16:34
Submitted by Rhysode on Sat, 03/17/2007 - 22:47