Expelled: No intellience abounds

Kwazy

Shared on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 16:15

I am an engineer, a mathematician, and a shade-tree philosopher. I am agnostic with admittedly strong atheist leanings. I believe all life forms on the planet evolved from one single-celled organism. Whether that parent organism came about naturally from the primordial ooze or by some sort of intentional seeding I've no strong opinion. I also would like to think myself inquisitive and open-minded. In the spirit of such, I streamed the Ben Stein "documentary" Expelled: No intelligence allowed from Netflix via my 360 this afternoon.

To those unfamiliar with the film, it is billed by those involved with its production and distribution as an investigative documentary exploring the suppression of scientific exploration involving the field of Intelligent Design, here after referred to as ID. In actuality, nothing could be further from the truth.

The film is essentially a three act play with an epilogue.

Act I: It is suggested that any academic that attempts to publish a paper about ID does so at his own peril. Interviews are shown with several professors whose careers were either derailed or ended because of involvement with the ID movement. Despite horrible editing and a continual interjection of cold war era stock film of the Berlin Wall and such, so far so good. This is what I was expecting.

Act II: An attempt to discredit Darwin and evolution is made. This starts out innocuously enough with interviewees illustrating some of the weaker points of the theory. These are well known to anyone with experience in the life sciences such as protein chain complexities and mathematical probabilities. But this segment quickly devolves (no pun intended) to the point where actual original cartoons are presented making fun of the very concept of evolution. This struck me as odd as my understanding of the intent of the movie was to point out the unscientific disdain which ID receives from the mainstream academic community. They're losing me at this point, but rather than turn it off, I stick it out.

Act III: This is where shit gets really loopy. A full half hour or so is now dedicated to illustrating how Darwinian Evolution leads to abortions, forced eugenics including sterilization, Nazism, and genocide. I am not making this up. Stein actually travels to a WWII era German asylum (essentially a concentration camp for the mentally ill) to attempt to hammer this point home. I am now absolutely flabbergasted.

Epilogue: At this point any attempts to present the illusion of an unbiased examination are completely discarded. The film now illustrates through Stein's narration and interviews how it is the underlying goal of evolution supporters to promote atheism and kill God. The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife. Intelligent Design is universally regarded in the scientific community as a secular version of Creationism. ID supporters maintain that it has nothing to do with religion, but is instead a legitimate theory of the origin of life. The present tone of the movie completely disregards that technicality. Now the flags start waving and the word "freedom" is bandied around like it's the Summer of 2003 in the White House Press Office. A wavy-haired Reagan gives his famous "tear down this wall" speech. Stein is shown at the podium of an undisclosed university auditorium forcefully proclaiming, "No lie can live forever!" It ends with a call to action from Stein to take the fight to the streets, even if it means the loss of your job, friends, and livelihood.

The strangest thing about this whole smoldering pile of crap is that it never actually describes or explains intelligent design whatsoever. There is a single, one word textbook definition presented...once. That is all. In actuality, there is a vast array of scientific (or at least pseudoscientific) concepts which describe ID and why it should be considered a valid, competing theory. The movie makes no attempt to discuss any of these, chosing instead to utlize fear and sensationalism.

I've got a theory on why this was case. The movie wasn't aimed at people like me. I expected too much and gave it way more credit than it deserved. It was aimed at the cabbages of society in need of harvest. The sheep. The easily led. Those who are too feeble of mind or lazy to think for themselves. I hope they enjoyed it. Me? I was just appalled.

 

Comments

He11vis's picture
Submitted by He11vis on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 17:16
I don't know you and have never read your blog so it was pure luck that I found this. Anyway, I would just like to say that this was an excellent commentary on a sub-standard movie. I can never figure out why the heck Intelligent Design promotors are still trying to convince people that ID is a) not based in religion and b) legitimate. Rant complete. Thanks for listening.
J-Cat's picture
Submitted by J-Cat on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 17:32
w00t. have more to say, but not the time to say it. Blogged about this a while back. if you like, OM me and I will send you the link.
Armorsmith76's picture
Submitted by Armorsmith76 on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 18:55
When running a propaganda program, pick the low hanging fruit first. The rest will follow, or be drowned out by the masses of new believers. Nothing new here. sad though...
Azuredreams's picture
Submitted by Azuredreams on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 20:13
I also streamed this pile of excrement and feel about the same as you do about it. Intelligent Design is nothing more than another recruitment tool of the brain washing brigade. Nothing in this world scares me more than someone who claims to be doing "God's work". It's always the same, take what you want from the Bible and or scientific community and bend it to fit your perception of the world and your own mortality. Fucking sheeple
TheDastard's picture
Submitted by TheDastard on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 20:20
+1. Nice writeup. And I agree...it was made for the cabbages. Unfortunately, in today's world, that can be effective. Cabbages vote.
RyanFromVegas's picture
Submitted by RyanFromVegas on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 21:10
Intelligent Design was first hypothesised in a book called Darwins Black Box by Michael Behe. My friend lent it to me a few years ago and I read it and actually found its argument fairly compelling...not definitive by any stretch, but enough for me to not freak out over it. As for my religious leanings Im similar to you, but leaning more towards agnostisism than atheism. The basis of the argument resides in the fact that the more we learn about the inner workings of the cell, the less we understand. The author is a biochemist I think and had an experts understanding of cell division and the like. He believes evolution is aboslutely proven for species adapting and so on but questions weather or not evolution alone is enough for the first spark of life. The basic ending argument was that the minimum complexity required to make the first cell function as a machine is vastly complex. The odds of the first cell just appearing approach the same odds of a the mona lisa appearing on a cave wall due to random mineral deposits. In the end, he self discloses that he is christian and believes the bibles account but his theory is broad enough for any religious interpretation including aliens populating the earth. Anyways, I recommend the book. Read for yourself what he says and make up your own mind. Dont listen to the talking heads on either side. Theres too much bias from both.
Kwazy's picture
Submitted by Kwazy on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 22:12
"The basic ending argument was that the minimum complexity required to make the first cell function as a machine is vastly complex. The odds of the first cell just appearing approach the same odds of a the mona lisa appearing on a cave wall due to random mineral deposits." As a numbers guy, I have a large problem with this argument...at least as I understand it thus far. The numbers presented express the improbability of life sparking on Earth. By most contemporary calculations the Universe is between 13 and 14 billion years old. Likewise it is thought to contain trillions of planets. We are not talking about the possibility of life starting spontaneously on Earth. We are talking about it happening on any one of these trillions of planets at any time over 14 billion years. The fact that we're having this conversation only means that we're on the planet where it did/could have happened, not that such a planet happens to be under us. See the difference?
RyanFromVegas's picture
Submitted by RyanFromVegas on Sun, 01/04/2009 - 22:45
Im at a disadvantage as its been several years since reading the book. he got very technical on what processes inside the cell exactly were causing the problems with evolution. There were many processes inside the cell that they had no idea how they worked at all..the chemical signals sent and received..how the protiens moved about the cell and how they were told where to go and by what. Any one piece of a part of a process out of whack and the cell dies. Like 100 processes and sub processes that had to work perfectly from day one or no life. The building block idea inherent in evolution did not hold up. Irreducable complexity I think was his phrase.. Anyways, I cant do his argument justice. Read the book. Like I said, I found his argument persuasive..not complete but it left reasonable doubt IMHO.
Kwazy's picture
Submitted by Kwazy on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 08:42
I'll check it out. Thanks for the conjecture.
TheDastard's picture
Submitted by TheDastard on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 09:37
There is a flaw in your reasoning. To the 'informed', there is only one planet and it is only 5000 years old. :)
Kwazy's picture
Submitted by Kwazy on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 10:23
Actually, I think it's more along the lines of 6000 years old, but I could be wrong :)
Deman267's picture
Submitted by Deman267 on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 10:28
Didn't we already have this argument back in the politics forum?In case you missed it,ID lost.:)
Kwazy's picture
Submitted by Kwazy on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 13:14
I stopped venturing into the Politics forum a few years ago. Too many people with absolutely no cognisance of how utterly dim they were.
AutumnRocks's picture
Submitted by AutumnRocks on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 19:55
:D +1

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p