Ummmm.... Freedom of Speech?

Lithium

Shared on Fri, 05/25/2007 - 08:42

OK, I heard this news bit this morning before taking off for work and I thought it was absolutly absurd. Some 16 year-old girl was upset with the repeated scheduling 'snags' for some school event. She then did what most people this day and age do when something pisses them off and they feel the need to vent: she bloged her rage. With in that blog she calls an unnamed school official a "douche-bag" (ala Profanity nonetheless). So somehow the Principal sees the blog, bans her from running for class secretary next year (a position she has held for her entire time in High School), 'asks' her to tell her mom about the comment and to apologize to 'unnamed official'.

It's not stated wether or not she used the officials name in the blog, but thats not the point, (there's not much difference in 'Principal Skinner is a dick' and 'my Principal is a dick'. It just takes a little more work to figure out who the principal is) the point is that she has every right to say what ever she wants in her PERSONAL blog. It's not like this was an unmerrited attack either, the teen had reason to call 'unnamed official' a douche-bag.

Also, what I'm wondering is how school officials got wind of this blog. I know most of internet is public domain (barring password protected sites and yada yada) but either they got tipped off or some official is a little pervy and snooping on students.

So the girl buckles, appologizes, and takes down the blog post. She had this to say, "It was an unsavory term and I shouldn't have said it. It was a rude comment. It was written thinking that it would be private and it didn't occur to me that it's on the Internet, it's public..." Well no shit the internet is public! She also said, "I mean I've really learned my lesson. You can't present yourself in that way..."

Big mistake, never apologize for anything like that! If she would have stood up for her first amendment right and not admit fault or wrong doing, she might have a leg to stand on when I comes to running for secretary again. Since she took the bullet (probally thinking that if she did they would reconsider the punishment) she is screwed because for most officials there is no grey area in between right and wrong.

Seriously, grow some skin. Its a teen being upset over something petty, thats nothing new. Feel privledged that she only called you a douche-bag! There is a lot worse trash a teen can call some one!

Bah, maybe I'm looking too hard into this, but if it was my daughter I would tell her to keep it up and don't apologize because you have the right to speak your mind in your own blog even if the public can read it. Douche-bags!

Full Story at NBC 30 CT

Comments

beholder's picture
Submitted by beholder on Fri, 05/25/2007 - 09:24
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men/hawt 16 year old girls do nothing... The end days are coming.... ;)
SoupNazzi's picture
Submitted by SoupNazzi on Fri, 05/25/2007 - 09:34
Bah, I've read better stuff on the back of Summers Eve boxes!
Lithium's picture
Submitted by Lithium on Fri, 05/25/2007 - 09:44
At least its a Lithium original!
SoupNazzi's picture
Submitted by SoupNazzi on Fri, 05/25/2007 - 10:04
Hey, when you are at work, and don't have a couple of hours to compose a story / funny, ya gotta do what ya gotta do.
Lbsutke's picture
Submitted by Lbsutke on Fri, 05/25/2007 - 10:09
I am now going to plays devils advocate...what if she wrote a blog about you and called you a douche bag..(not in the prof way).. I completely agree with your position on this...I just wanted to throw this out there?
Devonsangel's picture
Submitted by Devonsangel on Sun, 05/27/2007 - 22:31
li·bel (lbl)n. a. A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's reputation. b. The act of presenting such material to the public. The first amendment doesn't cover this. Emphasize the "public"
Lithium's picture
Submitted by Lithium on Tue, 05/29/2007 - 09:54
Well aware of libel, but the definition you provided is too broad and gives the wrong impression to parties less educated on the matter. libel: 2 a : a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression [2] b (1) : a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt (2) : defamation of a person by written or representational means (3) : the publication of blasphemous, treasonable, seditious, or obscene writings or pictures (4) : the act, tort, or crime of publishing such a libel... (From www.m-w.com) She had just cause, she was upset over an event that kept getting delayed. So with proper cause she can call 'unamed official' anything she so chooses. At any rate, if it was or is a matter of libel, thats for the lawyers to sort out and the article I read made no mention of lawyers, only shitty decisions by school officials.
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 20:44
For the rhythm of the monster beats , mainly for health. Dr. DRE will be able to find a shop in the beat. The beats by dre headphones them, it came so high qaulity dre beats headphones , when you use the products to be more comfortable. In addition to these newly monster beats by dre headphones .dre monster beats . For some who use the product said the product with excellent design to make people want their beats by dre outlet and one of the monster beats
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 23:47
Lithium's picture
Submitted by Lithium on Sat, 05/26/2007 - 11:15
Thats fine, its anyones and everyones right to speak their mind as they see fit. Like I said 'grow some skin' and while name calling may be a bit immature for chrissake its just that, name calling...
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/01/2011 - 19:03

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p