You spent too much on your shoes

Mandingo

Shared on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 09:54

I am by nature a researcher.  The advent of the internet has made it significantly easier.  When I was a kid I spent weeks comparing all brands of roller blades before spending my hard  earned lawn mowing money.

Now that I'm beginning to run a little more (sometimes a little less depending on the week), I'm trying to learn a little more.  One of the big things right now is the "fad" of  minimalism and natural running.  The premise is that modern running shoes, with all their  new cushions and technologies have not reduced injuries at all.  In fact, running  injuries have shot up over the last 30 years or so.  Not only that,  but  running in modern sneakers (the studies say) is much less efficient than barefoot and causes you to run "un-naturally."

I'm game.  Over the last few weeks I've tried to move to more of  a mid-forefoot run and  run more efficiently.  I've slowly increased mileage and I've been running with no socks and no footliner in Nike Frees.  I realize that they are still not close to barefoot but it's start.  This week I plan to head over to the local school's cross country course and do some  barefoot training on the grass. 

I'm not sure that I'm all gung-ho about the total barefoot thing.  But when I go to the gym I can't understand how people can thump, flop and bump on the treadmill with a heel-strike run.  It sounds terrible ( and painful on the shins).

I take everything in stride (pun intended), so I realized that the actual truth is somewhere in the middle of the extremes.  Nonetheless, there are more and more articles like this one coming out that are quite interesting.  Check it out and let me know what you think.......what have $200 shoes brought us??

Comments

VenomRudman's picture
Submitted by VenomRudman on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 10:22
In case you haven't seen this: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112995970 "Several companies — Vibram, Nike, Terra Plana — are creating shoes that look sort of like gloves for your feet. They're minimalist, with a little pocket for each toe, and they're catching on with a small but passionate community of runners who shun fancy, highly-engineered shoes and prefer to run as our shoeless ancestors did."
Mandingo's picture
Submitted by Mandingo on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 10:25
I've seen the vibrams. I can't justify $90 for water socks.
Sagitarian's picture
Submitted by Sagitarian on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 10:55
I used to run x-country in the late 80's and barefoot and/or on the grass was touted back then so it's not so new of a fad as people are making it out, perhaps it's just coming back as many old things do. Obviously they'll need to make a "sock" or something that'll cost you $100-$200 because if you're not buying shoes they'll need to get money for something.
TANK's picture
Submitted by TANK on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 11:25
If i've spent $40 on a pair of shoes, i think i've splurged.
char's picture
Submitted by char on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 13:02
This is one of the most interesting blogs I've read in a long time. I don't run, but I do walk a lot. A friend (who does run) told me wearing those reg. running shoes wasn't good for me, even for walking. He took me to a runners shoe store. They had me walk on a treadmill while making a video of how I walk. I’m thinking the whole time…sure sure whatever. Now I walk in high-tech running shoes and socks. I paid a lot for them, but now I couldn't do without them. I can walk a long way without getting worn out. It's made such a difference in how I walk and how I feel after walking. I always thought cotton stocks were best to wear, but these new ones are the best. I don’t know about the whole minimalist, no sock running shoe thing, but I’m intrigued.
FadeIntoBlack's picture
Submitted by FadeIntoBlack on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 21:53
I don't know. I run 40-50 miles a week and have run 2 marathons since Aug 22nd and I wouldnt for one second consider running barefoot for those...if it was ideal, you'd see the best in the world doing it. If you start running more hardcore, once you buy a pair that has been custom fitted (at a running store, not a Big 5 or Dicks) you can really see why shoes are such a big deal. If a person runs a mile here or a mile there they dont need to spend the money and there is a lot of hype in shoes. Correlation is not causation and all that guy had as evidence was anecdotal.
Mandingo's picture
Submitted by Mandingo on Wed, 09/23/2009 - 09:50
@fade - fair enough. What is your natural foot strike? If you run on grass barefoot is your stride the same as in your running shoes? Should it be? I think I mixed the topics of stride and shoes together.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p