Mega Touch, Much?

Robbway

Shared on Sat, 05/12/2007 - 17:46

One of my favorite things in a bar is the small video game consoles.  There's even a Touch Master game coming to the Nintendo DS.  But this little diddy is about Mega Touch 2007.  One game in particular drove me batty, Texas Hold 'Em.  First off, it's an expensive game with a timer.  It doesn't matter how much you win or lose, your game ends after about 3 minutes.  So I fold about 4 hands and then get an opener of J-3.  Thinking the Jack is a worthy starter card, I call to the next round.  The first 3 cards are J-3-3.  Sweet!  I have a full house in only five cards.  I raise once and call.  The next round I go all-in.  I'm gambling that no one has more that two-pair.  Two other players also go all-in.  Then the cards are revealed.  The other two win!  Guess what?  They both had two pair.  Full house beats two pair.  I was supposed to win.

I cross-checked my experience with a friend, and he said, "Never play Texas Hold 'em.  It's just broken."  I learned my lesson.  After that I just played a ton of Photo Hunt.  It's a fun game, but it's kind of hard after 3 pina coladas.

Comments

J-Cat's picture
Submitted by J-Cat on Sat, 05/12/2007 - 20:20
What pairs did your competition have? What was the full board?
CrypticCat's picture
Submitted by CrypticCat on Sun, 05/13/2007 - 08:58
I have a love-hate relationship with Texas Hold'em. Online I have won several 800 seat freerolls and I do quite KK in the micro-limits, in that I succeed in escaping with an even break. However, the off-line simulators give me fits, because the outcome of many hands is as unrealistic as Meg Ryan recovering from her Botox-lips. It just can't happen. Even though there is a statistic chance of being subjected to a bad-beat at least once in every session you play, the chance of getting smacked across the teeth with a bad-beat the next hand is next to nill. Overall, unless you're in a multi-day tournament, the number of personal bad-beats shouldn't be no higher than two. The chances of you being the winner of bad-beats is much higher, oddly enough. Many simulators put you at a distinct disadvantage, not only can you not draw people out on speech, which what I like to do at tables, chatter constantly about anything, or on your behavor, the only thing that you can have going for you is your hand-selection. Lastly, J-3 is not a starterhand, not even suited. First three positions after the BB are A/A, A/K pref.suited, A/Q pref.suited, K/Q pref.suited on a full table. Short handed you can play middle position hands aswell. J-3 pref.suited is a hand you can play while on the BB without a pre-raise in the early to middle positions and with folded late positions. Just check and be ready to fold on the flop, with a view on bagging an outside win. Depending on the skill of the players when the table gets shorthanded, you can play even less probable hands, alternating between being tight-agressive and loose-passive.
Robbway's picture
Submitted by Robbway on Mon, 05/14/2007 - 14:10
I don't really remember the other hands. The others had a pair of 3's, and I think one of the other pairs was Q's. If I only had two pair, I wouldn't have 'all-in." Also, thanks for the analysis. You can see why I don't like poker for real money.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p