Stereotypes

Devonsangel

Shared on Fri, 06/29/2007 - 07:49
Stereotype:
1. A conventional, formulaic, and oversimplified conception, opinion, or image.
2. One that is regarded as embodying or conforming to a set image or type.

I know this is a deep subject for a Friday, but a brief discussion in our clan forum got me started thinking of how stereotypes come about and their affect on how we view others.  The all knowing and accurate (sarcasm there) Wikipedia says

"Stereotypes are ideas held about members of particular groups, based primarily on membership in that group. They may be positive or negative prejudicial, and may be used to justify certain discriminatory behaviors. Some people consider all stereotypes to be negative. Stereotypes are rarely completely accurate, based on some kernel of truth, or completely fabricated. Different disciplines give different accounts of how stereotypes develop: Psychologists focus on how experience with groups, patterns of communication about the groups, and intergroup conflict. Sociologists focus on the relations among groups and position of different groups in a social structure.

There are definitely a few stereotypes represented in this community:  women, gamers, men, married, etc and variations of those groups.  I have always fought, either consciously or not, to not fit into the common stereotypes.  I have owned, fenced, planted and built my "castle", raised and plucked chickens, rode cattle pens, worked a feedlot, bartended, was a "bouncer" and was in a sorority in college.  Even there I bucked the system and tried to break out of the stereotype of a sorority girl.  All of this from a suburbia girl. I don't like the stereotype and at times I react to hearing others refer to a group of people in a general manner. 

On the other hand, most stereotypes come about there are people who fit the behavior or definition.  There are women who treat their husbands badly or don't listen to them, men who are lazy and don't help out around the house, asians who can't drive, bad tempered Italians, the list can go on, I'm sure.  So, how do we break this habit of categorizing people and lumping them all together in one group?  I know, I have been told not to be so sensitive but I'm an individual and I revel in that fact and try very hard to be me.  By ignoring the comments and allowing them to perpetuate, I feel we are doing a disservice to others and ourselves.  I'm not perfect, will never claim to be perfect and will apologize when I screw up.  Does that make me different, it shouldn't, that was how I was raised.  "Never judge a book by its cover" (I know cliche) 

Now are there some people who fit the stereotypes, sure, but, is it just coincidence that they do?  How many other "people" exhibit the same behavior but since they aren't in that particular group no one thinks twice about it.  It is only when someone in that group exhibits that particular behavior that people feel justified saying "See, I told you he/she would do that, it is in their nature, they all do."  Are you guilty of this?  Sadly, I have to say I am and I'm not proud of it.  But, I also mentally kick myself to stop.

Ok, I'm off the soapbox. 

Have a good weekend all!

Keep on Go!

Comments

TexasTwister55's picture
Submitted by TexasTwister55 on Wed, 07/04/2007 - 12:07
Many stereotypes are due to cultural differences. How we handle those differences is the key. And if you saw me on the street, I wouldn't strike you as being a teacher. I have long hair and wear Harley shirts. I wear a lot of black. I was doing this before Goth was in our vocabulary. I don't own a Harley, but I like them. People tell me I have a mullet, which is the butt end of jokes. My hair has looked the same way for over thirty years. And I wear black because I'm a Cash fan, and I like the color. If you say you don't see color or notice differences, you're fooling yourself. How you handle the differences . . .that's what matters.
TDrag27's picture
Submitted by TDrag27 on Fri, 06/29/2007 - 08:11
Believe it or not, but Wikipedia was tested head-to-head with Encyclopedia Britannica and it had 4 errors per article compared to Encyclopedia Britannica's 3 per article...BUT - Wikipedia's entries were about 2.6 times longer therefore the error rate is actually less...The book "Wikinomics" is all about this stuff...Really interesting. Okay - I know that's not what your blog was about...sorry!
Gman's picture
Submitted by Gman on Fri, 06/29/2007 - 08:30
I hate when I get pulled over for Driving While Being a Gamer....sorry, it's a tough thing to fight and it's an everyday battle in the military as well. If you're making an effort not to stereotype then you're already ahead of the game in my opinion. There was only one perfect person in the world and we killed him. All we can try to do is attempt to live up to that standard.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p