Voting for Boobs

Big0ne

Shared on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 11:58

For those who think that I am some how a brain dead voter who simply tows the party line, I thought I'd share a little something that I saw in the Convention coverage last night.

While flipping through the channels last night I happened to see Cindy McCain and Laura Bush being interviewed after their appearance at the Republican Convention.  Both ladies seemed very bright and well spoken and I think are probably excellent people in their own right.  However, I did hear one question that bothered me after hearing their answer.  The question was "What do you think of having a woman (referring to Palin) on the ticket?"  The answer both women gave was that they were excited to be able to vote for a woman on a national ticket.  (I'm paraphrasing, but that was the gist).  Now, this is something that really irritates me.  You see, I've been critical of the many many African American voters who will vote for Obama based SOLEY on his race.  They don't deny it and in fact embrace it.  I can't think of a worse determining factor to make such a decision on.  It would seem that if Obama were in favor of sacrificing kittens for the drinking of their blood, that would be ok, 'cause he's a black candidate and I want to vote for a black candidate. 

The same applies here.  I don't care if the VP candidate is a woman, black, handicapped, Aztec, Wiccan or anything else.  The question is, is the person I'm voting for, in my best educated guess and opinion, qualified?  That's all that matters.  That's all that should matter for any voter.  When I saw these two ladies make such a statement about wanting to vote for a woman, I couldn't believe I was hearing it from "leaders" in "my" party.  IF, and I emphasize if 'cause we may never know the true motives, McCain picked a VP running mate just because she's a woman, then he's dead wrong.  If a person votes for that ticket just because there's a woman on it, then in my humble opinion, that's a sexist and blind vote.

Comments

dkhodz's picture
Submitted by dkhodz on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:05
Cue the comments from 2o2p libs pointing out that they think America already voted for a boob in 2000 and 2004 right about... now.
Bertt's picture
Submitted by Bertt on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:09
in my opinion, marketing has way too much to do with the election, so I believe he made a choice based on what he/they (they being his election team) believe will give them the best opportunity for a win. I also do not believe we have had a "most qualified" candidate in office for some time. Rather, the office is held by the person with the strongest and weathiest backers. Those who want their adjendas represented the most.
MTK005's picture
Submitted by MTK005 on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:11
DoucheKHodz 08 - keeping the damn Liberals down, one at a time.
Lbsutke's picture
Submitted by Lbsutke on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:16
dude how freaking awesome would it be if the vp was a woman/wiccan and had a huge freaking rack!!!
ATC_1982's picture
Submitted by ATC_1982 on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:16
I would vote for the milf I mean that lady from alaska.
BalekFekete's picture
Submitted by BalekFekete on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:20
I'm just concerned a bit...ya' know, one week a month we could be declaring war on some random country if McCain kicks the bucket in office. :)
TDrag27's picture
Submitted by TDrag27 on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:20
I have started and deleted a comment about 8 times now because there is just so much I can say on this issue...I'll just have to blog about it someday.
Durty's picture
Submitted by Durty on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:26
I believe I blogged about this during the Hilliary/Obama fight to the finish. Black (D) women were having a 'hard time' deciding who to vote for: Hilliary because she is a woman or Obama because he is black. Didn't have a damn thing to do with who was most qualified or who they thought could lead this country in the way they believe it should be led, but only based on physical characteristics. Drives me crazy!! And I'm sure that's one of the reasons McCain did pick her as a running mate, purely to get some of 'that' vote. 'That' vote being, people who don't really think for themselves and only are voting this year, quite literally, on appearances alone.
webmonkee's picture
Submitted by webmonkee on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 12:43
Once again, let's remember that the taller candidate usually wins. Why be surprised by other physical characteristics becoming a factor? In principal, I agree 100 percent that votes should be based soley on ability to lead. However, as a white male, I've had plenty of my demographic to choose from, and I have never found any of them to exactly represent my ideal leader. So, if a woman feels another woman can better understand their POV, or ditto for a black person and a black candidate, I can't say I agree with the logic, but I can also not disprove it. My assumption, albeit it a tenuous one, is that anyone who makes it through the primaries and gets on a national ticket is not a complete moron. With that said, if it is more important to me to elect a woman rather than to elect someone who shares my economic beliefs, then that is my right. It is not for me to say that one method of determining my vote is inherently superior to another. I can point to the logic of my vote determination, but anyone who's married ought to know by now that logic is rarely the only way to make a decision. So, while I agree with your premise, I cannot automatically dismiss those who choose to base their vote on other criteria, particularly when I don't find either candidate worthy of my vote from a strict 'ready to lead' POV.
Devonsangel's picture
Submitted by Devonsangel on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 13:03
This is a different issue. You are looking at two women whose husbands are very much Republicans and they themselves are also Republicans. I don't think their answer is inconsistent with who they are. Now, if they were known to be Democratic and made that comment, then yes, I would agree that it appears they would be voting for the "woman" on the ticket. Now, looking at what this particular woman brings to the ticket, she just strengthens a tenuous vote for McCain. IMHO.
KingBayman's picture
Submitted by KingBayman on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 13:05
For the perfect political correct response, please see Webmonkee's post above (Trupundit) You know, if I just did that more often I would probably piss less people off.
Big0ne's picture
Submitted by Big0ne on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 13:16
I may not have made my point clearly enough in the blog. What if find inexcusable is those who will vote based ONLY on race/sex. If you've weighed both candidates and hate/love them equally or evaluated the plus/minuses of each and have come to a "tie" in choosing which to vote for, then I don't care so much if the tiebreaker is one looks more like you so they get your vote.
webmonkee's picture
Submitted by webmonkee on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 13:23
lol @ bayman. The really scary part is that is really how my mind works. I'm not trying to be PC. The way I am just happens to align with the notion of respecting everyone's opinion, regardless of if I agree with it. But, I will also say this: In a representative democracy, someone has to represent the fools. So, while that person won't get my vote, if the fools are in the majority, then the fools' candidate ought to win. :)
tait's picture
Submitted by tait on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 13:30
while, logically, i might agree, that's not how we - as humans - are wired, and it makes sense to make such big decisions based on reality rather than some fantasy world, utopian society, logically based way of thinking. truth is, we all do it. i'll play a game because my friends are playing it sometimes even if it's not a game i would've purchased otherwise. i'll buy a burger based on the picture without doing research on what people say about it's taste. we choose mates more on "chemistry" than we do on just laying side by side logical facts. we choose for reasons that psychology completely disagrees on on a daily basis. while i see your premise, i also know that i've seen you make decisions that have nothing to do with pure logic, before, so i'd say let's give it a pass on being "logical" due to natural humanity having a predelection to emotion based decision making, therefore it actually makes logical sense. :-)
tait's picture
Submitted by tait on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 13:34
oh, also, I meant to comment on your title - "voting for Boobs". Very ironic having such a sensational title designed for selling papers rather than truly describing your message. All the candidates have breasts (yes, men technically have "breasts" too - just some are more scary than others) so that was clearly a title devised to gain attention to your blog rather than a true salient point about boob voting. McCain's running mate clearly has the better boobs.
Big0ne's picture
Submitted by Big0ne on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 14:17
@ Tait - You're right. I've made snap judgments and arbitrary decisions and will do so again. That doesn't mean what I did was right or that I should ignore it when myself or others do the same wrong things.
Bertt's picture
Submitted by Bertt on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 13:39
One could also argue, that voting for a candidate based on his or her race or sex, is exactly the same as not voting for a candidtate based on their race or sex. For instance, there are democratics that will not vote for Obama because he is black.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p