1. Blogs
  2. J-Cat's blog
  3. COD: W@W v MW

COD: W@W v MW

J-Cat

Shared on Fri, 03/13/2009 - 08:54

Okay this is not to say which is the better game, it's just an observation.  I think I'm better at W@W than MW. I wonder why this is? Is it because that W@W is newer, and therefore the people I enter into a room with are not 10X prestige? Is it the weapons? Is it the game? Anyone else find that they are better in one than the other? Any theories as to why this happens? I use the MP40 in W@W, and the m16 in MV. Maybe I should level up a SMG in MW to get a red dot sight and see how I like it.  Any recommendations?

Erica is much better: puke free for a while now and generally really happy.

Looking forward to the Chi-Lan, but I may be the only one from 2old4BS/remember representing! Craziness. Anyone else going to be the lone clannie?

This weekend I don't have much going on: I think it's a PSP weekend. Date night tonight of course.

Comments

LuxDraconis's picture
Submitted by LuxDraconis on Fri, 03/13/2009 - 09:48
I'm better at MW, I also made sure to rank up to get my beloved P90, then the red dot for it. You heard those guys last night... "Fuck you Lux and that damn P90!" LOL!! You need to to understand that WaW is new, but more people are playing MW, it's just a better game. The pace is faster too.
Snuphy's picture
Submitted by Snuphy on Fri, 03/13/2009 - 10:09
I’ve noticed the same thing, and I don’t have a good answer. I originally thought that it was your first theory. I got MW a few months after release, and had to start MP playing gamers who had already prestiged several times. I got W@W at launch and started playing gamers on the same level. I’ve fallen behind in W@W, but I can still hold my own. I still get my butt kicked in MW. If I have an epiphany, I’ll let you know. I would suggest bagging the M16 on smaller maps. Try the MP5.

click for more 2O2P member action

click for more 2O2P member action

© 2007 Media Crumb Inc. All rights reserve Media Crumb Inc.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p