Pay-to-Play Call of Duty, Would You Do it?

TimboJackson

Shared on Fri, 07/16/2010 - 20:40

 

As the anticipation of Call of Duty: Black Ops nears closer, dropping to a store near you on November 9th, the idea of paying for multiplayer online has been brought back up to the front burner. The idea of having to fork over $60 for a game is really mind boggling, but it’s easier to swallow than paying for the game AND paying to play online. Crazy idea? Not really. According to industry analyst Michael Pachter, he is suggesting that Activision do what we gamers hope doesn’t come to pass, playing Black Ops but having to pay-to-play multiplayer online.

It has been reported that the Wedbush Morgan Securities analyst is lobbying Activision to start this service beginning with the highly anticipated Black Ops game. Michael Pachter said, “We think that it is incumbent upon Activision – with the most popular multiplayer game – to take the first step to address monetisation of multiplayer. It is too early to tell whether that will be a monthly subscription, tournament entry fees, micro-transaction fees, or a combination of all three, but we expect to see the company take some action by year-end, when Call of Duty: Black Ops releases.”

This is probably coming from the greedy idea of Activision chief Bobby Kotick who has said just last month that, “I would have Call of Duty be an online subscription service tomorrow. When you think about what the audience's interests are and how you could really satisfy bigger audiences with more inspired, creative opportunities, I would love to see us have an online Call of Duty world. I think our players would just have so much of a more compelling experience.”

Seriously? I can’t believe that after a very lucrative year for Activision, Mr. Bobby Kotick would even suggest such an asinine idea. Modern Warfare 2 has already sold over 20 million copies since release, not to mention the Call of Duty franchise has earned them $3 billion. Additionally, the Stimulus Package broke Playstation Networks and Xbox Live records from so many people ordering the download content, even when the price was jacked up at 1200 Microsoft points. After all of this, the idea of pay-to-play still exists. If Activision wants to start an massive multiplay online game and charge for that is one thing, but continuing the regular console games and then charging extra for online play is ludicrous.

Although, I guess I answered my own question. It’s simple, really; the answer is greed. It comes down to the all mighty dollar and even though most people will pay, this gamer has bought his last COD game and refuses to give in to these corporate money hungry thugs.

 

This deserves the famous quote from Darth Vader in Star Wars: Episode III

 

 

Sources: Pay-to-Play Story | Activision Boss Bobby Kotick Story | MW2 Sales - MCVUK Story

Comments

Habu06's picture
Submitted by Habu06 on Fri, 07/16/2010 - 22:06
What if they did a World of Warcrack model? Give you COD BO multiplayer for free but make you pay a subscription to continue playing after a few days. Or, how about this? The basic single player only game is $50 but raise the price of the game with a multiplayer add on to 65-70 dollars. Then sell upgrades to weapons through xbox marketplace similar to EA selling Battlefield Bad Co 2 SPECAT upgrades.
TANK's picture
Submitted by TANK on Fri, 07/16/2010 - 23:13
Hell i probably won't even bother picking up BlackOps to begin with never mind paying to play online. I pay for live already, when we hav eto start paying for live AND paying to play individual games, forget about it way to greedy. After seeing the clusterfuck that was Modern Warfare 2 multiplayer, there's no way in hell i would put up with that shit if i were stupid enough to pay to play that specifically. I'd expect it to work PROPERLY.
Fish66's picture
Submitted by Fish66 on Sat, 07/17/2010 - 00:00
Pay $60.00 Per Game Pay $50.00 Per Year Then Pay $X.00 to play MP on Games that are not complete on launch or over a year latter. Not a chance. GOW3 L4D2 Tango Down I'll be fine, no worries :)
redeye's picture
Submitted by redeye on Sat, 07/17/2010 - 01:03
I would pay to play a Call of Duty game that had the content and developer support to warrant it.
VenomRudman's picture
Submitted by VenomRudman on Sat, 07/17/2010 - 01:15
Every stupid fucking article about this idiotic concept forgets about the 800lb gorillas in the room: Microsoft and Sony. Do you really think MS will let Activision do this? Or Sony? Not a chance in hell. That leaves the PC and sure, Activision can implement their pay to play model there but what percentage of the market is that, %5?
redeye's picture
Submitted by redeye on Sat, 07/17/2010 - 02:16
I agree venom. We won't see this kind of thing on the 360. In a way I guess our XBL fee protects us from shite like this. I've heard rumours that some developers are encouraging development of a 'user friendly' gaming PC, specifically to get away from Sony and Microsoft.
Habu06's picture
Submitted by Habu06 on Sat, 07/17/2010 - 07:22
Sony and Microsoft will allow pay for play as long as they get a taste. Look at this way, you pay a yearly fee to Microsoft / Sony then pay a subscription fee to Activision which in turns has to pay Microsoft / Sony an access fee. Even at 1 or 2 % of the subscription price, that could translate to millions back to Micro /Sony on top of their annual fee. I think as soon as they can figure out how to make this work, they're going to try it. Just like the avatar items and add on maps. Microsoft gets a slice of that because you use MS points.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p