Rhysode's blog

Who throws TIEs around like frisbess but has a tough time with stun baton guy who appears to be ex-Air traffic control with palsy (this could also explain the real story behind bringing down the stardestroyer).

They could have used the tech to make another Jedi Knight game with actual lightsaber system that inspired dueling like the films and a story that feels less forced (no pun). That also would have been mutliplayer friendly as were past Jedi Knight games.

Who throws TIEs around like frisbess but has a tough time with stun baton guy who appears to be ex-Air traffic control with palsy (this could also explain the real story behind bringing down the stardestroyer).

They could have used the tech to make another Jedi Knight game with actual lightsaber system that inspired dueling like the films and a story that feels less forced (no pun). That also would have been mutliplayer friendly as were past Jedi Knight games.

Gamespot made it fairly clear, that if you buy enough banner ads, you deserve a good review score.

Gamespot made it fairly clear, that if you buy enough banner ads, you deserve a good review score.

Im a little tired of this subject too, just want to put my final thoughts and overall view in my blog. To be honest, I haven't blogged as consistantly as I used to, I've also been able to vent on such issues while working so repeating them is not that desirable. This is more of a rant about miss-directed criticism.

Im a little tired of this subject too, just want to put my final thoughts and overall view in my blog. To be honest, I haven't blogged as consistantly as I used to, I've also been able to vent on such issues while working so repeating them is not that desirable. This is more of a rant about miss-directed criticism.

Where do I begin? This game has been getting reviews ranging from 58/100 to 93/100. As usual, the gaming community is split between "sucks" and "awesome". No middle ground for the gamers but major sites like IGN, Gamespot, and EuroGamer scored it in the 80% range. Out of 52 reviews only 6 scored it below 80/100.

I was hoping this game was just "good". Fearing a complete mess I was suprised with a great experiance. I was thinking, how the hell could a gamer not like this one?

Here are some issues I think some people had with it...

1) Realistic aiming, No aim assist

Where do I begin? This game has been getting reviews ranging from 58/100 to 93/100. As usual, the gaming community is split between "sucks" and "awesome". No middle ground for the gamers but major sites like IGN, Gamespot, and EuroGamer scored it in the 80% range. Out of 52 reviews only 6 scored it below 80/100.

I was hoping this game was just "good". Fearing a complete mess I was suprised with a great experiance. I was thinking, how the hell could a gamer not like this one?

Here are some issues I think some people had with it...

1) Realistic aiming, No aim assist

I see alot of false statements about PC gaming that people seem to state so confidently as fact. To think some people miss out on a possible great new experiance because of someones misinformation, half-truths, un-truths, or just plain nonsense, is unacceptable. I've corrected peoples statements on here before with no rebuttal. And sometimes only to see them show up later and say the same thing they said before.

I see alot of false statements about PC gaming that people seem to state so confidently as fact. To think some people miss out on a possible great new experiance because of someones misinformation, half-truths, un-truths, or just plain nonsense, is unacceptable. I've corrected peoples statements on here before with no rebuttal. And sometimes only to see them show up later and say the same thing they said before.