data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74886/74886ce2adb55967e320e25d55db19bcb56f59a8" alt=""
slowthumbs
Shared on Sat, 03/27/2010 - 08:33This is the year. The year that we the payers of social security will pay into the system less money than the payees of social security receive in benefits.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/business/economy/25social.html?hp=&adx...
This article lays it out pretty succinctly and even has some very easy to read graphs. I would advise all who have socialistic tendencies to read it. Socialism is NOT sustainable. it may work for a decade or two (or 5) but eventually, it caves in on itself.
I have to think about this because i have parents that are depending on SS because they were told the lie that it will always be there for them. They didn't plan for anything else. I know... not smart. but it is the reality I have to deal with. I wish there was a viable option that made sense and wasn't so politically charged. Could we step off the mari-go-round for just one cycle and have a couple of smart economists step in and fix things financially, then let the bleeding hearts back in?
*sigh*
bw
- slowthumbs's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Submitted by bludjun on Sun, 03/28/2010 - 03:04
Submitted by Rayne46 on Sun, 03/28/2010 - 03:55