Losing weight

tait

Shared on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 15:21

Does 48 pounds in one year sound like a lot of weight to lose?  It does to me!

It's ironic, though, that we typically expect to lose weight very quickly.  Let me explain - if you suddenly get interested in losing weight, what do you consider a success?  When you drop 5 pounds in a week?  Well, come on now - that'd be over 250 pounds in a year and that's ridiculous for most of us.  So, I crunched the numbers and used 48 because it was easy - that's only 4 pounds per month.  I figured that out because 4 times 12 is 48.  I did it in my head, even.  48 pounds in a year is about 0.92 pounds per week - just under one pound.  And, that's just 0.13 pounds per day or roughly 2 ounces.  Do you overeat about 2 ounces in a day?  Of course - we all do.  But, do you see just how little you'd have to cut back each day to make a huge impact?  It's just that we usually measure success in a crazy short view of what we want to lose without breaking down the big goal into small goals.  So, do this - figure out how many pounds you want to lose in one year (realistically) and divide it by 52 - that's how much per week.  Does that number look too big?  If so, adjust your goals - if not, then really think about it - go ahead and figure it out per day (divide again by 7) - looks pretty darn manageable, huh?

OK, before I share a cool website with you, I would also flip this around on you - think about it from the other side.  All you'd have to do is add about 2 ounces of junk to your weight each day and you could gain 48 pounds in a year.  Imagine that!  Imagine putting on 48 pounds in the next year!  Sobering... so, keep that in mind the next time a 4 ounce cookie is proferred to you at the office, or you're deciding between a grande and a venti at Starbucks.  2 ounces....

The cool website I mentioned is http://sparkpeople.com where you can (for FREE) track your calories and set goals.  SparkPeople will also help you make grocery lists based on your goals - it's very cool.  And FREE!

Enjoy... in moderation  :-)

Comments

SoupNazzi's picture
Submitted by SoupNazzi on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 15:23
How about 45 lbs in 3.5 months? :)
Irion's picture
Submitted by Irion on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 15:28
45lbs in an hour? Just do liposuction!! :-)
Kyosogi's picture
Submitted by Kyosogi on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 15:53
Calorie intake/expenditure is the key, not the amount or the weight of the food. Foods are broken down to the amount of calories they provide: carbs 4 calories per gram, protein 4 carbs per gram, fat 9 calories per gram, alcohol 7 calories per oz. 2 ounces of bacon is a different caloric intake than 2 ounces of lettuce. Calories that are not used are stored as fat. Calories that are used are used as energy, and dissipated as heat. If you consume 5000 calories in a day, and use 5000 calories during that day, you are net zero and will not store any. However, if you consume 5000 and use 1200, you store the remainder as fat (in simple terms). One of the biggest misunderstandings is most people's inference of a "high metabolism." No one is "blessed with a high metabolism" (referring to weight gain). You are either physically active in using calories, or not. Weight gain/loss is not as complicated as many people have made it out to be. *I know this because I spent 2 years studying, and working, as a personal trainer.
jquack's picture
Submitted by jquack on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 21:51
I set minor goals with a bigger goal in mind, right now I'm trying to get myself down to 260, from 280. I've setup a goal system, where I concentrate on trying to lose 5 lbs. Once I lose 5 lbs, I know that's a big step, so I strive to lose 5 more. I try not to set a time frame...too much pressure.
Mandingo's picture
Submitted by Mandingo on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 16:46
shit, I came in here to make the same correction that kyosogi made. not weight of food, caloric value compared to expenditure. I'll go now.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p