The Declaration of Independence

cmoth

Shared on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 10:40

This is a continuation of my discourse on what makes the United States of America different and will lead into why I personally believe that we are discontented with our present system as it has developed with our assistance and apathy.

What follows is the "copy and paste" text of the Declaration of Independence. This document does more than proclaim to the Government at the time our reasons for seeking seperation. It is a document that identifies the intentions of the Founding Fathers as to the state of mind and their beliefs which led to the Bill of Righst and the Constitution that would follow our succesful rebellion. It was obtained from www.earlyamerica.com , Google it.

The men that signed this document, identified themselves openly as traitors to the Government in power at the time and would have led to their prosecution and eventual execution where they to fail.

If you are unfamiliar with these words and look on this long document and decide, "It's too much reading" then you are part of the problem.

Declaration of Independence


 

Here is the complete text of the Declaration of Independence.
The original spelling and capitalization have been retained.

(Adopted by Congress on July 4, 1776)

The Unanimous Declaration
of the Thirteen United States of America

 

 

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
 
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
 
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
 
He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
 
He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
 
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
 
He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
 
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
 
He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
 
He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
 
He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
 
He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
 
He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.
 
He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.
 
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:
 
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
 
For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:
 
For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:
 
For imposing taxes on us without our consent:
 
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:
 
For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:
 
For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:
 
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:
 
For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
 
He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.
 
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
 
He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.
 
He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.
 
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
 
In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
 
Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.
 
We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
 

Comments

cmoth's picture
Submitted by cmoth on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 00:26
It takes a lot to get people worked up enough to where they would risk as much. But, when you read the list of complaints, and consider that they were described in a socially acceptable way instead of with all the ire they caused, it sin't hard to see why they would seek freedom. Consider this, if England hadn't been ruled by the "Crazy King George" at the time, and if a more reasonable monarch had been on the thrown, the colonys might not have split. Our own George the Firts (George Washington) was offered the Presidency for life and an almost King-like title. Thankfully he refused. It wasn't a monarchy that we objected to so much as the restrictions and intrusions.
cmoth's picture
Submitted by cmoth on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 00:27
I wish I could edit blog entries. My typing skills are getting a bit dislexic.
KittenMag's picture
Submitted by KittenMag on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 11:09
gahhh.. you know what I hate.. when you take time to write up a response to a blog, and then accidentally close the browser, MOTHERFUCKER!!! lol What I was trying to say is that it is somewhat ironic to read the declaration of independence, as what we have once fought we have become ourselves. (to a certain extent) Today's US of A is very similar to the England of the 1700s. I'm not saying what we're doing is necessarily wrong, it's just interesting that we (as in the American nation) were trying to break off from a very "policing" type state, yet we administer those same rules on other countries.
cmoth's picture
Submitted by cmoth on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 11:24
It has become that way because we have allowed it to. Thomas Jefferson write that it is a natural progression of government to eventually become overbearing and oppressive. It is only through continual maintenance you overcome this. Give up the maintenance and it will grow uncrontrolled. In addition to apathy, we have also grown less aware of our responsibilities and how much authority the PEOPLE are supposed to have. We ASK the governemtn to do things for us, they oblige. With that assistance comes intrusion. Look at the State highway funds and how the Feds attach strings to it. When a State refuses certain Federal regulation and intrusion, the Feds threaten to withdraw highway funds and other grants the States have become accustomed to. It is the same with the lives of privte citizens. If we accept nationalized healthcare we hand over control for or healthcare to those that pay the bills. It is that simple.
d0od's picture
Submitted by d0od on Tue, 03/03/2009 - 14:06
Thanks for the post been a while since I have read that. It's easy to forget these guys were considered traitors.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p